Driver’s License Hearings

September 6th, 2008

Let’s say you’ve been pulled over for drunk driving (also known as OWI, for Operating While Intoxicated) in the state of Wisconsin. Some people may consider this a minor charge, especially when compared to more serious crimes, but in fact there are serious legal consequences if you are convicted. Even if you are a responsible driver, it is good to know what to expect in this situation, as police officers do make mistakes and you want your rights to be protected.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Your Criminal Record

September 5th, 2008

Many people do not want to get arrested for only the most obvious reasons. Naturally no one wants to pay a fine, conduct forced community service, or spend time in jail. But the effects of a conviction can last longer than you may realize. A criminal record can follow you for the rest of your life, affecting your job prospects, reputation, and political capital.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Free Background Checks Help You Sleep at Night

September 4th, 2008

When we worry, there is usually a very good reason for it. Though some are just naturally anxious, or have an event in the recent past that keeps them off kilter, most who worry have a need to do it. Worry tells us that something is not right, and that perhaps we have to come up with some type of solution to something. It is something that people do, and as annoying as worry is, it is a great tool for problem solving. If something bothers you to the point that it disrupts your life, you have to figure out why.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Why Would I Run a Free Criminal Background Check?

September 3rd, 2008

Trust is a huge issues with all people. It is an essential thing in any type of relationship, but we all know that even good people make mistakes. Trust is about fidelity in a romantic relationship, of course, but trust is a broader issue. You have to trust that someone will not harm you, has the best of intentions, and that they are not hiding anything from you. There are many reasons why you may want to run free criminal background checks in the future.

If you are dating for the first time, or perhaps after the breakup of a marriage, you may be unsure about what you are doing. That is natural, and it is something that everyone goes through at one time or another. However, you do have to be careful about who you trust if dating locally or through the Internet. Some sex offenders will go for single moms, knowing that gives them access to children. If you have kids, do free checks on someone before they get anywhere near them no matter how wonderful they may seem to you.

Having a maid come into your home once a week or even once a day may sound like a dream come true, but it could turn into a rather nasty nightmare if you do not know with whom you are dealing. The sweet looking grandma type may take you for all that you are worth and you won’t see it coming. You should always do criminal checks on anyone that is going to have access to your home at any time in anyway. Be on the safe side.

You can also to criminal checks on those that move into your neighborhood. If you have many coming and going, this can be a pain. What you can do is focus on the ones that are very close to you, and the ones that cause you to pause when you meet them. Never ignore those inner alarms that go off when you meet someone. They are usually going off for a reason.

While you may not have much luck when you try to find free criminal background checks online, you can find some great information on how to do this one your own. You can also find links that take you to sites that can sell you the information you need if there is anything out there with which you should be concerned.

Neil Douglas likes to write about online investigations. Visit http://freebackgroundchecksusa.com to read more of his work.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

How Can You Get Accurate Information on Free Background Checks

September 2nd, 2008

Gathering some important information about a certain person is hard to do. The only way to do it is to visit different government agencies or even local courthouses. And if money is not a matter, you even hire a private investigator. But do you realize that it is too expensive to do all this things and not only about spending money but also spending a lot your time and exerting all your effort. And in the end, still it is insufficient.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Win Your DUI Criminal Defense and Force the Government to Prove Their Case Part II

September 1st, 2008

So you were coming home from the wedding a little late at night and you had decided to toast the bride and groom one too many times….. You were stopped, the officer started the process and DUI education, here you come at full speed. Each DUI in the Bay Area, California triggers two separate and totally different types of cases.

The first case is the most well known because it involves the great big chamber and the big robe and gavel. Yes, I mean the Court Process or Criminal Court Proceedings. This involves any evidence collected at the time of arrest among other things. The second charges brought against someone once arrested for drinking and driving involve the Department of Motor Vehicles and an administrative per se or APS case.

In California vehicle code 13558, 14100 and 14103, time limits were set on how many days until contact must be made with the DMV after arrest. Due to these time limits, when an attorney takes a new DUI case in the Bay Area, they must contact the DMV within the first 10 days of arrest and request an APS hearing. A very important step and one that sadly enough sometimes forgotten or overlooked during the drama on a DMV arrest.

This step is critical for the Attorney or person charged to be completed in a timely manner and affects whether or not the arrested individual will be able to keeo his/her license in the ling run. When calling a criminal defense attorney about drunken driving charges, most of the time, one of the first questions asked after, when were you arrested, is have you filed paperwork with the DMV to request a DMV hearing?

DUI’ s in the Bay Area in California are growing, almost on a monthly basis since the new laws lowered the legal limit to 0.08%. The drunken driving arrests affects poor people more than the rich. Even though the public defenders office and system will help the poor in court and during the criminal part of the proceedings, the arrestees are completely on their own when it comes to the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Most of the low income clients that you will find in a defense attorney’s office are looking for a lawyer simply for the DMV hearing and nothing else. They are worried about their license and of course the status of transportation when it comes to getting to their jobs, families and shopping.

Anyone who forgoes the DMV hearing automatically loses the right to drive in California and any rights and defenses that existed are waived by the person arrested. If in the Bay Area at the time of arrest, and you have a CA drivers license, it is suspended for at least 4 months (or one year upon first offense refusal of chemical test). Having a commercial drivers license has steeper penalties for the arrestee.

Most people simply don’t understand their rights once arrested and released and end up waiving all of their rights at the APS DMV Hearing. Not obtaining the proper defense attorney quickly after arrest can lead to several problems in the end, not the least of which losing your drivers license. Your lawyer should file that paperwork for you and make sure to make the 10 day limit and get the DMV their request in a timely manner.

Looming foremost on most arrestees minds once they have been charged with a DUI is normally, what will happen to my drivers license? Hopefully once arrested, they have the state of mind needed to obtain the proper lawyer and get the paperwork filed with the DMV in time to keep the worry to a minimum.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Criminal Defense Attorneys Note Oddities in Healthcare Fraud Statistics

August 31st, 2008

At the start of the new millennium, Americans were spending 1.3 trillion dollars each year on healthcare; anyone with a proper understanding of human nature recognizes that, when that much money is at stake, the unethical among us seek their personal benefit at the cost of those around them. The IRS estimates that between 3 and 10% of healthcare costs may be fraudulent. Even at minimum, that’s an absolutely paralyzing $39 billion lost, including over $13 million in Medicare payments-yearly.

Obviously, something should be done. And yet, as so often happens, federal investigators and prosecutors typically rely on a heavy and injudicious hand-rather than a consistent one-when it comes to stanching the flow of money lost to healthcare fraud. The strategy appears to be to make examples of individuals, rather than bring about systemic change, which would be inconvenient and difficult.

Statistical data bears this out. According to government statistics, a mere 466 investigations of healthcare fraud were undertaken between 2005 and 2007, with only 203 cases actually resulting in sentencing. Investigation and prosecution of fraud cases is certainly a complex field, but it seems obvious that a $39 billion dollar problem can’t be caused by a mere 50-60 people each year.

The same human nature that leads to healthcare fraud leads investigators and prosecutors to cut corners, attempting to solve a legitimate problem with minimal effort and personal expenditure. The problem lies in the fact that, when the focal point become individual prosecution rather than systemic change, it’s entirely possible for the innocent to be greatly inconvenienced, falsely accused, or even wrongfully convicted.

Daniel Wannamaker is a board certified criminal law specialist and has 24 years of criminal trial experience with proven results as a Dallas criminal defense lawyer practicing in Austin criminal defense and Houston Texas. To learn more, visit http://www.wannamakerlaw.com

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Texas DWI Defense Attorneys Assist Texas Residents in DWI Cases

August 30th, 2008

2004 saw nearly 100,000 drunk-driving arrests in the state of Texas-basically, one for every 230 Texas residents. Although operating a vehicle while under the influence is certainly a grave offense, everyone deserves legal defense under the law, and no one should pay time or money for a crime they didn’t commit.

Although the legal limit in Texas is 0.08 BAC (blood alcohol content), drivers can still be pulled over for DWI even if their BAC falls within the legal limit if their driving appears to be impaired by drugs or alcohol. In the event that you find yourself pulled over for driving while intoxicated, the roadside breath test is voluntary, and it is never in your best interest to submit to a roadside breathalyzer test; if you submitted to the breath test, however, fret not-there are several legitimate defenses that can be used to impugn the results of a roadside breath test.

The same goes for breath, blood, or alcohol tests after booking. Never submit to an alcohol test of any kind until you’ve spoken with an attorney qualified to mount a DWI defense in the state of Texas.

The most important thing to remember is this: never, ever admit to guilt or discuss the case until you’ve spoken with a qualified DWI attorney. The primary aim of a DWI defense attorney is to get the charges dropped; if that proves impossible, the secondary goal is to find a way for you to retain your driver’s license-your lifeline to gainful employment. Both of these goals can be jeopardized by admitting guilt, submitting to alcohol test, or spending time discussing the charges with arresting or booking officers.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

Win Your DUI Criminal Defense and Force the Government To Prove Their Case Part I

August 29th, 2008

A drunken driving arrest or DUI case can be challenging, especially if you plan to win in California. When handling and taking a new client’s drunk driving case, it is important to have a thorough understanding of both the criminal court case and the Department of Motor Vehicles APS (administrative per se) cases.

The current system in the Bay Area and all over California has a long line of convictions and the list is growing as the counties pocketbook finds more and more budget cuts. Defense counsel, either public or private can go to work for you and stop the political crime of DUI cases charged daily.

In 1990, California lowered her limit from 0.10% to 0.08%, knowing that it would “catch” many more people in the web than previously under the higher alcohol content limit. Let’s look for a minute, in simple argument, to what 0.08% really looks like to the layperson. This small amount of alcohol means that it cannot be seen with the naked eye. A mathematician would say that it is 8/100’s of One Percent of a person blood is some form of ethyl alcohol.

There are naturally more and more DUI Drunken driving cases each year, no wonder and naturally the number of people looking for a defense lawyer locally is growing each day. People need a good defense and they are looking for help in fighting their case. I even recently met a man who was in a Drunken Driving Education Program, ordered by the court for his DUI, which involved prescription drugs, which he had to take for his health, and involved NO alcohol at all.

This man had to take 18 weeks of a course to keep his already restricted drivers license and keep driving his children to school. For someone who never drank alcohol due to his medical condition and had obvious problems, counsel would have been his best option. He had decided against it and had paid the price dearly.

It is the duty of your defense attorney to counsel or maintain those actions, proceedings, or defenses only as appear to him as legal or just, except the defense of a person charged with a public offense. It is very righteous and self liberating for anyone to defend their case and make the Government prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Currently, it is estimated that approximately 1/3 of the over 170,000 California DUI Cases every year have very legitimate and authentic scientific and legal issues and defenses. Having a defense lawyer to fight for you and find these defenses is critical to your future and future decisions in court. Each DUI triggers two separate cases that every good DUI Lawyer is well voiced in. The first is the Criminal Court Case and the second being the DMV case involving your driver’s license.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

It’s Not Just the Godfather’s Problem

August 28th, 2008

Racketeering is not a common word. In fact, most Americans only hear the word in the context of late-night legal dramas, as actors portray DAs devoted to stopping the Mafia in cut-and-dried cases where guilt is obvious. Regardless of how it’s presented in the media, racketeering is a complicated allegation and a costly crime, impacting the financial security of millions of Americans, whether or not they’re aware of it.

The legal definition of racketeering is fulfilled when a group or organization that is centrally controlled, through a clearly hierarchical system, knowingly engages in criminal activity.

RICO–the short name for the legislation that governs racketeering investigations and prosecution-was passed in 1961 as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. RICO’s primary area of concern is to break up organized crime, including protection scams, gambling schemes, or prostitution and theft rings disguised as legitimate business ventures. But these were not the greatest threat posed by organized crime; a more serious threat-the protection of American pensions–still flies under the radar of those who draw their knowledge of organized crime from movies like The Godfather.

Beginning in the early twentieth century, the membership of American labor unions grew extremely rapidly-and as membership soared, the amount of money funneled into retirement pensions and other employer incentives for those workers also increased dramatically. With millions of dollars up for grabs, organized crime and labor unions began a complicated relationship, with union leadership encouraged, coerced, and often threatened into handing pension management contracts off to Mafia interests.

RICO’s role has changed somewhat since 9/11, as it is now used to prosecute a wide range of criminal allegations in the federal government’s effort to stanch the flow of cash to terrorists. These prosecutions are typically viewed uncritically, and lauded as a valuable part of our defense against terrorism. Yet some critics, many of whom are criminal defense attorneys, insist that the current climate of absolute anti-terrorism hysteria contributes to a win-at-all-costs mentality, resulting in the prosecution (and sometimes conviction) of innocent individuals.

And the critics may have the data on their side. The Office of the General Inspector’s website offers the following numbers: racketeering cases referred for prosecution have remained basically stable from 2001 to 2005, while the number of indictments has shot up by more than 75%. Additionally, the number of cases actually prosecuted has increased by nearly three-fourths. It stands to reason that, if the number of allegations remains steady, the number of cases actually tried should as well; the statistics, then, indicate an obviously alarming trend.

This trend makes a cautionary point: as prosecutors move cases toward court with abandon, and jurors are deluged nightly with news about terrorist concerns, an experienced and effective white collar defense lawyers is absolutely necessary to any racketeering case.

Doug Slain is a sex crimes lawyer and sex crime criminal defense lawyer in San Francisco and Oakland California. To learn more, visit http://www.sexcrimescounsel.com.

Read more

Posted in Criminal Law Review | No Comments »

« Previous Entries